Home > School of Law > Student > Law Review > Vol. 33 (2011) > Iss. SYMPOSIUM: FIDUCIARY DUTIES IN THE CLOSELY HELD FIRM 35 YEARS AFTER WILKES V. SPRINGSIDE NURSING HOME
Western New England Law Review
SYMPOSIUM: FIDUCIARY DUTIES IN THE CLOSELY HELD FIRM 35 YEARS AFTER WILKES V. SPRINGSIDE NURSING HOME
Prefatory Material
MASTHEAD, LAW SCHOOL FACULTY & ADMINISTRATORS, PUBLICATION INFORMATION, TABLE OF CONTENTS
Western New England Law Review
Symposium Articles
WILKES V. SPRINGSIDE NURSING HOME, INC.:THE BACKSTORY
Eric J. Gouvin
ENDURING EQUITY IN THE CLOSE CORPORATION
Lyman Johnson, Washington and Lee University School of Law
WILKES V. SPRINGSIDE NURSING HOME, INC.: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Mark J. Loewenstein, University of Colorado Law School
ALLOCATING THE ROLES FOR CONTRACTS AND JUDGES IN THE CLOSELY HELD FIRM
Robert B. Thompson, Georgetown University
DONAHUE’S FILS AINE: REFLECTIONS ON WILKES AND THE LEGITIMATE RIGHTS OF SELFISH OWNERSHIP
Daniel S. Kleinberger, William Mitchell College of Law
THE VACUITY OF WILKES
Benjamin Means, University of South Carolina School of Law
OF DONAHUE AND FIDUCIARY DUTY: MUCH ADO ABOUT . . . ?
Douglas K. Moll, University of Houston Law Center
INVESTING IN WORK: WILKES AS AN EMPLOYMENT LAW CASE
Deborah A. Demott, Duke University School of Law
CLOSE CORPORATION REMEDIES AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE CLOSELY HELD FIRM
Larry E. Ribstein, University of Illinois College of Law
Notes
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—CROSS-GENDER PAT SEARCHES:THE BATTLE BETWEEN INMATES AND CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ENTERS THE COURTROOM
Robyn Gallagher