Home > School of Law > Student > Law Review > Vol. 20 (1998) > Iss. TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE: SYMPOSIUM - A DUTY TO REPRESENT? CRITICAL REFLECTION ON STROPNICKY v. NATHANSON
Western New England Law Review
TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE: SYMPOSIUM - A DUTY TO REPRESENT? CRITICAL REFLECTION ON STROPNICKY v. NATHANSON
Symposium Articles
DO YOU REALLY WANT A LAWYER WHO DOESN'T WANT YOU?
Gabriel J. Chin
WHEN PRINCIPLED REPRESENTATION TESTS ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW
Terri R. Day and Scott L. Rogers
SECTION 98 AND THE SPECIALIZED PRACTICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS LAW
James A. Gardner
LAWYERS' IDENTITIES, CLIENT SELECTION AND THE ANTIDISCRIMINATION PRINCIPLE: THOUGHTS ON THE SANCTIONING OF JUDITH NATHANSON
Bruce K. Miller
LAWYER DISCRIMINATION AGAINST CLIENTS: OUTRIGHT REJECTION—NO; LIMITATIONS ON ISSUES AND ARGUMENTS—YES
Samuel Stonefield
Alumni Articles
"CAT-OUT-OF-THE-BAG" & "BREAK-IN-THE-STREAM-OF-EVENTS": MASSACHUSETTS' REJECTION OF OREGON v. ELSTAD FOR SUPPRESSION OF WARNED STATEMENTS MADE AFTER A MIRANDA VIOLATION
Katherine E. McMahon
Articles
REFLECTIONS ON TWENTY YEARS OF THE LAW REVIEW
Howard Kalodner
SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT: HAVE THE RULES CHANGED IN MASSACHUSETTS?
Thomas H. Seymour