Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2016
Abstract
This Article discusses how continued national security exceptionalism engenders a view of the United States as considering itself to be above international obligations to investigate and prosecute torturers and war criminals, and the view by the global community that the United States is willing to apply one standard for itself, and another for the rest of the world. Exceptionalism not only poses real challenges in terms of law, morality, and building useful relationships with allied nations, but acts as a step backward for the creation of enforceable international norms and standards, and in efforts to restore a balance in the rule of law when it comes to national security matters.
Recommended Citation
Sudha Setty, Obama's National Security Exceptionalism, 91 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 91 (2016)
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons