Document Type

Dissertation

College

College of Arts and Sciences

Department

Psychology

Degree

PhD in Behavior Analysis

Dissertation Defense Date

2024-11-25

First Committee Member

Ahearn, William H

Second Committee Member

Roscoe, Eileen M

Third Committee Member

Bourret, Jason C

Additional Committee Member(s)

Thompson, Rachel H

Abstract

To date, only one behavior analytic study has systematically examined the use of functional analysis to assess arranging and ordering, which is a form of higher-level repetitive behavior (Rodriguez et al., 2012). The authors found this response was automatically maintained and developed effective interventions that involved some form of prompting and response disruption. Hagopian et al. (2015) evaluated a model for subtyping and predicting effective treatments for automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (SIB). The current study applied Hagopian’s subtyping analysis and treatment model (i.e., competing stimulus assessments) to higher level repetitive behavior (Hagopian et al. 2015, 2017). A variety of assessments, including preference assessments and augmented-competing stimulus assessments (A-CSA) were conducted to inform treatment. Following treatment, generalization probes were conducted. For all participants, effective treatments were identified that consisted of providing competing stimuli identified via the A-CSA.

Share

COinS