•  
  •  

Home > School of Law > Student > Law Review > Vol. 46 > Iss. 3

 

Western New England Law Review

Ryan Ockenden

Abstract

Unlike some similarly situated nations, the United States does not recognize the right to shelter. As a result, the country’s homelessness epidemic is exacerbated by anti-homelessness laws that punish homeless people for peddling, dumpster-diving, or sleeping in public encampments. Largely supported by the government, non-profit charities receive funding in order to deliver sheltering services into communities; however, shelters often have restrictions on who they allow to access their services. The U.S. Supreme Court has not held that there is no right to shelter, but federal and state courts have used Supreme Court precedent to carve out an understanding that no such right exists. The U.S. Constitution provides a limited number of enumerated rights, but the Supreme Court has utilized the substantive due process doctrine to find constitutional rights that are not explicit in the text of the Constitution. In 2022, the Court demonstrated a shift in their approach to substantive due process analyses by abandoning their practice of engaging in a balancing test to determine to what extent governments could restrict people’s liberty. Instead, the Court reasoned that for an unenumerated right to be constitutionally recognized, it must be deeply rooted in the nation’s history or essential to ordered liberty.

With a change in approach, the right to shelter must be reconsidered. The philosophies of the American Founders acknowledge the importance of assisting the poorest sects of society not only because it fulfills the government’s duty to seek justice, but because it is critical for the legitimacy of a nation. From the Colonial era until the turn of the twentieth century, state and local governments provided sheltering services to their communities’ poorest. These services first came in the form of poorhouses and then via state-run institutions that provided care for people with the highest risk of homelessness, such as abandoned children and people with mental or physical impediments. Throughout the twenty-first century, the federal government stepped into the arena and began providing relief by funding programs that prevent homelessness and by providing grants and contracts to non-profit charities that deliver sheltering services directly to communities. Given the extensive history of government-backed sheltering services, the importance of shelter to the integrity of American justice, and the philosophies of the American Founders, this Article shows that a modern analysis supports the right to shelter despite prior judicial holdings to the contrary.

Download

Share

COinS