CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/EVIDENCE—UNITED STATES V. CHARLES: A POST-CRAWFORD ANALYSIS OF AN INTERPRETER AS A DECLARANT: DID THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TAKE ITS DECISION A BRIDGE TOO FAR?

Authors

Daniel Benoit

Recommended Citation

Daniel Benoit, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/EVIDENCE—UNITED STATES V. CHARLES: A POST-CRAWFORD ANALYSIS OF AN INTERPRETER AS A DECLARANT: DID THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT TAKE ITS DECISION A BRIDGE TOO FAR?, 37 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 301 (2015), https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol37/iss3/5